API Docs Pricing Studio Blog
High Volume Inquiry
Sign In

Play.ht vs. IBM Watson

The best way to compare Play.ht vs. IBM Watson: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Voice
Language
Format
Normal
Speed
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Play.ht

Play.ht

Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.
Text to speech API - IBM Watson

IBM Watson

Convert text into natural-sounding speech in a variety of languages and voices.

Voice Quality

Play.ht Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.17
Non-Fiction
4.17
Conversation
3.48

IBM Watson Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Play.ht Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

IBM Watson Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • Both Play.ht and IBM Watson offer a robust set of features for text-to-speech services, including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, per-word timestamps, speed control, and support for phone formats.
  • However, IBM Watson distinguishes itself with pitch control, a feature not available in Play.ht.
  • This comparison highlights the importance of specific features like pitch control for users who require more nuanced voice modulation capabilities in their text-to-speech applications.

Pricing & Plans

Play.ht Pricing

Free
$0/mo
12,500 characters
Creator
$39/mo
250,000 characters
Unlimited
$99/mo
2.5M characters limit

IBM Watson Pricing

Free
$0/mo
10,000 characters
Standard
$20per
1M characters

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • In a comparison of Play.ht and IBM Watson text-to-speech services based solely on pricing, IBM Watson emerges as the more cost-effective option for users with moderate needs due to its lower-priced Standard Plan.
  • However, for users with minimal requirements, Play.ht offers a slightly better free plan with more characters available at no cost.
  • For those with very high usage demands, Play.ht's Unlimited Plan provides a significantly higher character limit, making it a preferable choice despite its higher price point.

Customer Reviews

Play.ht Reviews

4.6 out of 5
Average of 293 ratings from leading review sites.
Play.ht is highly praised for its diverse and realistic voice options, ease of use, and excellent customer support. Users appreciate the ability to create audio content efficiently, especially for multilingual and varied voice needs. However, some users note issues with natural inflection, especially with complex terms, and express concerns about the pricing structure and occasional technical glitches. The platform's continuous updates and addition of new features are well-received, though some desire more control over voice modulation and better integration with certain plugins.
Voice diversity
Ease of use
Customer support
Pricing
Natural inflection
Technical reliability

IBM Watson Reviews

4.1 out of 5
Average of 44 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate IBM Watson Text to Speech for its ease of integration, speed, and support for multiple languages, making it versatile for various applications like education, customer service, and accessibility for the disabled. The ability to customize voice and tone is highly valued. However, some users note issues with pronunciation accuracy, limited language options, and occasional software glitches. The pricing is also considered high for small businesses or individual users.
Ease of integration
Speed
Language support
Customization
Pronunciation accuracy
Software reliability
Pricing
Language diversity

Compare Alternatives

Play.ht Alternatives

Play.ht vs. Unreal Speech
Play.ht vs. Amazon Polly
Play.ht vs. ElevenLabs
Play.ht vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
Play.ht vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Play.ht vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Play.ht vs. Murf API
Play.ht vs. Neets.ai
Play.ht vs. Resemble.AI
Play.ht vs. LOVO AI
Play.ht vs. Deepgram Aura

IBM Watson Alternatives

IBM Watson vs. Unreal Speech
IBM Watson vs. Amazon Polly
IBM Watson vs. ElevenLabs
IBM Watson vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
IBM Watson vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
IBM Watson vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
IBM Watson vs. Murf API
IBM Watson vs. Neets.ai
IBM Watson vs. Resemble.AI
IBM Watson vs. LOVO AI
IBM Watson vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

  • In comparing Play.ht and IBM Watson text-to-speech services, both platforms offer high-quality, AI-powered voiceovers with a range of features suitable for various needs.
  • While Play.ht provides slightly better voice quality scores and a more generous free plan, IBM Watson stands out for its cost-effectiveness in the standard plan and unique pitch control feature.
  • Ultimately, the choice between Play.ht and IBM Watson depends on the user's specific requirements, including voice quality preferences, budget constraints, and the need for advanced features like pitch modulation.

Looking for a better alternative to Play.ht & IBM Watson?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →
Made with ❤️ in SF
Powered by Kokoro TTS
Founder
API Docs Pricing Studio Contact Blog Compare Browse AI Apps Affiliate

Recent Posts

Integrating FastSpeech 2 for Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Fairseq and Hugging Face Exploring the Potential of GPT-SoVITS-Fork for Text-to-Speech Applications Exploring the GPT-SoVITS Kancolle Zuikaku TTS Model: A Comprehensive Guide Exploring Voice Synthesis with ESPnet: A Deep Dive into the kan-bayashi_csmsc_fastspeech Model Introducing OpenVoice: Revolutionizing Text-to-Speech with Instant Voice Cloning and Multilingual Capabilities How to Leverage Twelve Labs API for Effortless YouTube Video Summaries, Chapters, and Highlights
Sign In