API Docs Pricing Studio Blog
High Volume Inquiry
Sign In

Deepgram Aura vs. Play.ht

The best way to compare Deepgram Aura vs. Play.ht: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Voice
Language
Format
Normal
Speed
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Deepgram Aura

Deepgram Aura

Responsive, natural-sounding text-to-speech to power voicebots and conversational AI applications.
Text to speech API - Play.ht

Play.ht

Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.

Voice Quality

Deepgram Aura Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A

Play.ht Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
4.17
Non-Fiction
4.17
Conversation
3.48
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Deepgram Aura Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Play.ht Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • In comparing the features of Deepgram Aura and Play.ht, it's evident that Play.ht offers a more feature-rich text-to-speech service.
  • Play.ht supports voice cloning, is multi-lingual, provides per-word timestamps, and allows for speed control, making it versatile for various applications.
  • In contrast, Deepgram Aura's feature set is more limited, lacking in voice cloning, multi-lingual support, per-word timestamps, pitch control, and speed control, though it does support phone formats.

Pricing & Plans

Deepgram Aura Pricing

Pay As You Go
$15per
1M characters
Growth
$4k-10k/year
Pre-paid credits for entire year
Cost: $13.50 per 1M chars

Play.ht Pricing

Free
$0/mo
12,500 characters
Creator
$39/mo
250,000 characters
Unlimited
$99/mo
2.5M characters limit

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • Deepgram Aura offers a cost-effective Pay As You Go plan for users with lower text-to-speech needs, making it an attractive option for those on a tight budget or with sporadic usage patterns.
  • Play.ht, on the other hand, shines for users with consistent high-volume needs, especially with its Unlimited plan that caters well to those requiring extensive character usage monthly.
  • For high-volume users, Deepgram Aura's Growth plan could potentially offer value, but without specific details on character inclusion, Play.ht's transparent and flexible monthly plans present a clearer advantage for varied user requirements.

Compare Alternatives

Deepgram Aura Alternatives

Deepgram Aura vs. Unreal Speech
Deepgram Aura vs. Amazon Polly
Deepgram Aura vs. ElevenLabs
Deepgram Aura vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
Deepgram Aura vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Deepgram Aura vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Deepgram Aura vs. Murf API
Deepgram Aura vs. Neets.ai
Deepgram Aura vs. IBM Watson
Deepgram Aura vs. Resemble.AI
Deepgram Aura vs. LOVO AI

Play.ht Alternatives

Play.ht vs. Unreal Speech
Play.ht vs. Amazon Polly
Play.ht vs. ElevenLabs
Play.ht vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
Play.ht vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Play.ht vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Play.ht vs. Murf API
Play.ht vs. Neets.ai
Play.ht vs. IBM Watson
Play.ht vs. Resemble.AI
Play.ht vs. LOVO AI

Summary

  • In summary, Play.ht emerges as the more versatile and feature-rich text-to-speech service, offering higher voice quality scores, a broader range of features including voice cloning and multi-lingual support, and flexible pricing plans suited for both low and high-volume users.
  • Deepgram Aura, while more limited in features and voice quality evaluation, presents a cost-effective Pay As You Go option for users with sporadic or low text-to-speech needs.
  • Overall, Play.ht stands out for users seeking comprehensive text-to-speech capabilities, whereas Deepgram Aura may appeal to those prioritizing budget over breadth of features.

Looking for a better alternative to Deepgram Aura & Play.ht?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →
Made with ❤️ in SF
Powered by Kokoro TTS
Founder
API Docs Pricing Studio Contact Blog Compare Browse AI Apps Affiliate

Recent Posts

Integrating FastSpeech 2 for Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Fairseq and Hugging Face Exploring the Potential of GPT-SoVITS-Fork for Text-to-Speech Applications Exploring the GPT-SoVITS Kancolle Zuikaku TTS Model: A Comprehensive Guide Exploring Voice Synthesis with ESPnet: A Deep Dive into the kan-bayashi_csmsc_fastspeech Model Introducing OpenVoice: Revolutionizing Text-to-Speech with Instant Voice Cloning and Multilingual Capabilities How to Leverage Twelve Labs API for Effortless YouTube Video Summaries, Chapters, and Highlights
Sign In