API Docs Pricing Studio Blog
High Volume Inquiry
Sign In

Murf API vs. IBM Watson

The best way to compare Murf API vs. IBM Watson: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Voice
Language
Format
Normal
Speed
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Murf API

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.
Text to speech API - IBM Watson

IBM Watson

Convert text into natural-sounding speech in a variety of languages and voices.

Voice Quality

Murf API Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A

IBM Watson Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Murf API Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

IBM Watson Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • Both Murf API and IBM Watson offer a range of features that cater to the needs of developers looking to integrate text-to-speech services into their applications, including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, pitch and speed control, and support for phone formats.
  • However, IBM Watson distinguishes itself with the addition of per-word timestamps, a feature not available in Murf API, potentially offering more precise control for applications requiring detailed synchronization of audio with text.
  • Despite these similarities and differences, the choice between the two may ultimately depend on specific project requirements, such as the need for per-word timestamps or the scale of text-to-speech conversion needed.

Pricing & Plans

Murf API Pricing

API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)

IBM Watson Pricing

Free
$0/mo
10,000 characters
Standard
$20per
1M characters

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • In a direct comparison of pricing for text-to-speech services, IBM Watson stands out as offering significantly better value with its Standard Plan compared to Murf API's annual subscription.
  • IBM Watson not only provides a free tier for low usage but also ensures affordability at higher usage levels.
  • This makes IBM Watson a more cost-effective choice for users looking to integrate text-to-speech services into their applications or services.

Customer Reviews

Murf API Reviews

3.8 out of 5
Average of 819 ratings from leading review sites.
Murf API generally receives praise for its variety of natural-sounding voices, user-friendly interface, and quick setup, making it a popular choice for voiceover projects. Customers appreciate the diverse voice options and the ability to customize speech patterns. However, there are significant concerns about the pricing model, which many find too expensive and restrictive in terms of voice generation limits. Additionally, there are complaints about customer service and misleading information regarding free trials and subscriptions. Issues with billing practices and refund policies are also frequently mentioned, causing distrust among some users.
Voice quality
User interface
Setup
Voice variety
Customization
Pricing
Customer service
Billing practices
Refund policy

IBM Watson Reviews

4.1 out of 5
Average of 44 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate IBM Watson Text to Speech for its ease of integration, speed, and support for multiple languages, making it versatile for various applications like education, customer service, and accessibility for the disabled. The ability to customize voice and tone is highly valued. However, some users note issues with pronunciation accuracy, limited language options, and occasional software glitches. The pricing is also considered high for small businesses or individual users.
Ease of integration
Speed
Language support
Customization
Pronunciation accuracy
Software reliability
Pricing
Language diversity

Compare Alternatives

Murf API Alternatives

Murf API vs. Unreal Speech
Murf API vs. Amazon Polly
Murf API vs. ElevenLabs
Murf API vs. Play.ht
Murf API vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
Murf API vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Murf API vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Murf API vs. Neets.ai
Murf API vs. Resemble.AI
Murf API vs. LOVO AI
Murf API vs. Deepgram Aura

IBM Watson Alternatives

IBM Watson vs. Unreal Speech
IBM Watson vs. Amazon Polly
IBM Watson vs. ElevenLabs
IBM Watson vs. Play.ht
IBM Watson vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
IBM Watson vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
IBM Watson vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
IBM Watson vs. Neets.ai
IBM Watson vs. Resemble.AI
IBM Watson vs. LOVO AI
IBM Watson vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

  • When comparing Murf API and IBM Watson for text-to-speech services, IBM Watson emerges as a more cost-effective and feature-rich option.
  • It offers a free tier and a competitively priced standard plan, along with unique features like per-word timestamps, making it suitable for a wide range of applications.
  • However, the choice between the two should be based on specific project needs, including voice quality and the scale of text-to-speech conversion required.

Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & IBM Watson?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →
Made with ❤️ in SF
Powered by Kokoro TTS
Founder
API Docs Pricing Studio Contact Blog Compare Browse AI Apps Affiliate

Recent Posts

Integrating FastSpeech 2 for Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Fairseq and Hugging Face Exploring the Potential of GPT-SoVITS-Fork for Text-to-Speech Applications Exploring the GPT-SoVITS Kancolle Zuikaku TTS Model: A Comprehensive Guide Exploring Voice Synthesis with ESPnet: A Deep Dive into the kan-bayashi_csmsc_fastspeech Model Introducing OpenVoice: Revolutionizing Text-to-Speech with Instant Voice Cloning and Multilingual Capabilities How to Leverage Twelve Labs API for Effortless YouTube Video Summaries, Chapters, and Highlights
Sign In