API Docs Pricing Studio Blog
High Volume Inquiry
Sign In

Murf API vs. Resemble.AI

The best way to compare Murf API vs. Resemble.AI: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Non-Fiction
Fiction
News
Blog
Conversation
0/250
Voice
Language
Format
Normal
Speed
Filesize
0 kb
Text to speech API - Murf API

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.
Text to speech API - Resemble.AI

Resemble.AI

AI voice generator with voice cloning for text to speech.

Voice Quality

Murf API Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A

Resemble.AI Samples

Mean Opinion Score
Fiction
N/A
Non-Fiction
N/A
Conversation
N/A
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Murf API Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Resemble.AI Features

Voice Cloning
Multi-lingual
Per-word Timestamps
Pitch Control
Speed Control
Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • Both Murf API and Resemble.AI offer voice cloning and multi-lingual support, highlighting their versatility in creating diverse and customized voice experiences.
  • However, Murf API provides additional control over voice modulation with pitch and speed control features, and supports various phone formats, which Resemble.AI lacks.
  • On the other hand, Resemble.AI stands out with its per-word timestamps feature, offering more precision in syncing audio with text, a functionality not available in Murf API.

Pricing & Plans

Murf API Pricing

API Subscription
$3000/year
12M characters (per year)

Resemble.AI Pricing

Basic
$0.006/second
Pay as you go
~$480 per 1M characters
Pro
$99/mo
80,000 seconds (~1M chars)
Extra: $0.002 per second

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • For users with high volume text-to-speech needs, Murf API emerges as a straightforward and potentially more budget-friendly choice with its flat annual rate.
  • On the other hand, Resemble.AI's Pro Plan shines for those with variable or lower usage requirements, offering the most cost-effective solution, particularly for the initial included characters.
  • Overall, while Murf API caters well to heavy users, Resemble.AI provides flexible options that can accommodate both low and moderate usage economically.

Customer Reviews

Murf API Reviews

3.8 out of 5
Average of 819 ratings from leading review sites.
Murf API generally receives praise for its variety of natural-sounding voices, user-friendly interface, and quick setup, making it a popular choice for voiceover projects. Customers appreciate the diverse voice options and the ability to customize speech patterns. However, there are significant concerns about the pricing model, which many find too expensive and restrictive in terms of voice generation limits. Additionally, there are complaints about customer service and misleading information regarding free trials and subscriptions. Issues with billing practices and refund policies are also frequently mentioned, causing distrust among some users.
Voice quality
User interface
Setup
Voice variety
Customization
Pricing
Customer service
Billing practices
Refund policy

Resemble.AI Reviews

3.6 out of 5
Average of 12 ratings from leading review sites.
Customers appreciate Resemble.AI for its time-saving capabilities, voice cloning accuracy, and the ability to add emotions and tones to AI-generated speech. It is particularly valued for content creation and localization features. However, criticisms include its pay-as-you-go pricing model, limited language options without premium plans, and occasional technical glitches like voice pitch issues and electronic noises. Some users also find the user interface could be improved and the AI voices need to sound more natural.
Time-saving
Voice cloning accuracy
Content creation
Localization
User interface
Naturalness of AI voices
Pricing model
Language options
Technical performance

Compare Alternatives

Murf API Alternatives

Murf API vs. Unreal Speech
Murf API vs. Amazon Polly
Murf API vs. ElevenLabs
Murf API vs. Play.ht
Murf API vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
Murf API vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Murf API vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Murf API vs. Neets.ai
Murf API vs. IBM Watson
Murf API vs. LOVO AI
Murf API vs. Deepgram Aura

Resemble.AI Alternatives

Resemble.AI vs. Unreal Speech
Resemble.AI vs. Amazon Polly
Resemble.AI vs. ElevenLabs
Resemble.AI vs. Play.ht
Resemble.AI vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech
Resemble.AI vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech
Resemble.AI vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech
Resemble.AI vs. Neets.ai
Resemble.AI vs. IBM Watson
Resemble.AI vs. LOVO AI
Resemble.AI vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

  • In comparing Murf API and Resemble.AI for text-to-speech services, both platforms offer unique strengths, with Murf API being more suited for high-volume users due to its cost-effective annual subscription and additional voice modulation features, while Resemble.AI caters to those with variable usage patterns through its flexible pricing and unique per-word timestamps feature.
  • Although direct comparisons of voice quality are not provided, the feature sets suggest both services prioritize high-quality, customizable voice outputs.
  • Ultimately, the choice between Murf API and Resemble.AI depends on the specific needs of the user, whether those are in terms of budget, volume, or specific features like voice cloning, multi-lingual support, and audio-text synchronization.

Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & Resemble.AI?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →
Made with ❤️ in SF
Powered by Kokoro TTS
Founder
API Docs Pricing Studio Contact Blog Compare Browse AI Apps Affiliate

Recent Posts

Integrating FastSpeech 2 for Text-to-Speech Synthesis with Fairseq and Hugging Face Exploring the Potential of GPT-SoVITS-Fork for Text-to-Speech Applications Exploring the GPT-SoVITS Kancolle Zuikaku TTS Model: A Comprehensive Guide Exploring Voice Synthesis with ESPnet: A Deep Dive into the kan-bayashi_csmsc_fastspeech Model Introducing OpenVoice: Revolutionizing Text-to-Speech with Instant Voice Cloning and Multilingual Capabilities How to Leverage Twelve Labs API for Effortless YouTube Video Summaries, Chapters, and Highlights
Sign In