Murf API vs. LOVO AI

The best way to compare Murf API vs. LOVO AI: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Get Started for Free →

Live Demo

Non-Fiction

Fiction

News

Blog

Conversation

0/250

Speed

0 s

Filesize

0 kb

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.

LOVO AI

Hyper realistic AI voice generator that captivate your audience.

Voice Quality

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

N/A

Non-Fiction

N/A

Conversation

N/A

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

N/A

Non-Fiction

N/A

Conversation

N/A

Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Voice Cloning

Multi-lingual

Per-word Timestamps

Pitch Control

Speed Control

Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Voice Cloning

Multi-lingual

Per-word Timestamps

Pitch Control

Speed Control

Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Both Murf API and LOVO AI offer voice cloning and multi-lingual capabilities, catering to a wide range of applications and audiences.
However, Murf API provides more control over the voice output with features like pitch control, speed control, and support for phone formats, which LOVO AI lacks in some areas, such as pitch control and phone format compatibility.
Despite these differences, the choice between them may hinge on specific project requirements, such as the need for per-word timestamps or the preference for more nuanced voice customization options.

Pricing & Plans

API Subscription

$3000/year

12M characters (per year)

Free

$0/mo

5 minutes (~3K chars)

Basic

$29/mo

2 hours (~80K chars)

Pro

$48/mo

5 hours (~200K chars)

Pro +

$149/mo

20 hours (~800K chars)

For users with high volume text-to-speech needs, LOVO AI's Pro + Plan emerges as the most cost-effective option, offering the best value.
For those with moderate usage, LOVO AI still provides competitive pricing, particularly with its Pro Plan.
Murf API, while slightly more expensive for moderate use, offers a straightforward annual payment plan that may appeal to users looking for simplicity in billing.

Customer Reviews

3.8 out of 5

Average of 819 ratings from leading review sites.

Murf API generally receives praise for its variety of natural-sounding voices, user-friendly interface, and quick setup, making it a popular choice for voiceover projects. Customers appreciate the diverse voice options and the ability to customize speech patterns. However, there are significant concerns about the pricing model, which many find too expensive and restrictive in terms of voice generation limits. Additionally, there are complaints about customer service and misleading information regarding free trials and subscriptions. Issues with billing practices and refund policies are also frequently mentioned, causing distrust among some users.

Voice quality

User interface

Setup

Voice variety

Customization

Pricing

Customer service

Billing practices

Refund policy

3.4 out of 5

Average of 200 ratings from leading review sites.

Customers appreciate LOVO AI for its realistic and diverse AI voices, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness. Many find it a valuable tool for creating voiceovers and content across various languages. However, some users report issues with robotic-sounding voices in certain languages, limited emotional range, and occasional technical glitches. The customer support and interface improvements are also areas highlighted for enhancement. Despite these issues, many users see LOVO as a beneficial tool for efficient and flexible voice generation.

Voice realism

Ease of use

Cost-effectiveness

Language diversity

Emotional range

Customer support

Technical stability

Compare Alternatives

Murf API vs. Unreal Speech

Murf API vs. Amazon Polly

Murf API vs. ElevenLabs

Murf API vs. Play.ht

Murf API vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

Murf API vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech

Murf API vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech

Murf API vs. Neets.ai

Murf API vs. IBM Watson

Murf API vs. Resemble.AI

Murf API vs. Deepgram Aura

LOVO AI vs. Unreal Speech

LOVO AI vs. Amazon Polly

LOVO AI vs. ElevenLabs

LOVO AI vs. Play.ht

LOVO AI vs. Google Cloud Text-to-Speech

LOVO AI vs. Microsoft Azure AI Speech

LOVO AI vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech

LOVO AI vs. Neets.ai

LOVO AI vs. IBM Watson

LOVO AI vs. Resemble.AI

LOVO AI vs. Deepgram Aura

Summary

When comparing Murf API and LOVO AI for text-to-speech services, both platforms offer unique strengths, with LOVO AI standing out for its cost-effectiveness across various usage levels and Murf API providing more advanced voice customization features such as pitch control and phone format support.
While the voice quality metrics are not provided, the feature sets suggest that both services cater to a wide range of applications with capabilities like voice cloning and multi-lingual support.
Ultimately, the choice between Murf API and LOVO AI will depend on the user's specific needs, whether they prioritize advanced voice customization options or are looking for the most economical solution for their text-to-speech requirements.

Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & LOVO AI?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Get Started for Free →

Murf API vs. LOVO AI

Live Demo

Murf API

LOVO AI

Voice Quality

Murf API Samples

LOVO AI Samples

Features

Murf API Features

LOVO AI Features

Features - Conclusion

Pricing & Plans

Murf API Pricing

LOVO AI Pricing

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

Customer Reviews

Murf API Reviews

LOVO AI Reviews

Compare Alternatives

Murf API Alternatives

LOVO AI Alternatives

Summary

Looking for a better alternative to Murf API & LOVO AI?

Try Unreal Speech! You get 250,000 free characters every month.

Recent Posts